Gee-wizz, John. I thought we weren't suppose to talk about Iraq? Remember
the last flame war we had? Well, since we are about to go at it again I
will only make one little itty bitty comment which is that I hope we bomb
the hell out Iraq and roll our tanks right into the palaces of that
madman in Baghdad.
Enough said. Now back to lurking. :-)
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:04:41 -0900 "John W. Redelfs"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here are three important questions that need to be answered before we
> launch a preemptive strike against Iraq:
> Who has more nuclear weapons, Iraq or the United States?
> Who has more chemical weapons, Iraq or the United States?
> Who has more biological weapons, Iraq or the United States?
> If the answer is the United States in all three cases, then I
> consider it
> gross hypocrisy for us to use Saddam's weapons of mass destruction
> justification for aggression against another sovereign state. Now
> if it
> can be prove by evidence that Saddam Hussein was in some way behind
> attack on the WTC, that will constitute an attack on our own soil,
> and I
> would fully support full retaliation by launching as invasion of
> However, I'm not sure there is any evidence to pin the WTC attack on
> Hussein. It seems to me that if there was, then the current
> in the White House would trot it ought as the primary argument for
> war with
> Iraq. That they have not done so is the best proof that Saddam was
> involved in the September 11th attacks.
> John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!