Hello,

You can remove or add names to the ZNet Update system from the ZNet top
page, as always (www.zmag.org/weluser.htm)

--

The Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA) have
been the most steadfast and effective organization seeking justice
within Afghanistan for over a decade. Their statement on the anniversary
of 9/11 should, by all rights be forefront in the U.S. mainstream
media...as will be evident upon reading it...but isn't, of course. So,
below, we include it in this mailing.

--

The ZNet site will be down today, for roughly two hours midday --
approximately 1 - 3 PM Eastern Standard Time -- to move our servers. We
are sorry about any inconvenience. Do not be alarmed, it is just
shifting around computers and other hardware at our host provider. If
anything should go wrong and the delay should be longer than
anticipated, please don't worry...we will be back.

--

In response to our entreaties to our 85,000 free update recipients to
become sustainers, we have had a number of messages asking us how, given
our radical politics and our social change agendas, we could think it is
right to charge fees for any online content. Just replying that we don't
charge fees for online content but instead offer some additional
services as a premium to supporters...is insufficient. We want to reply
more fully. So below, after the RAWA statement, we have also included a
ZNet statement regarding our views of internet revenue issues. 

--

The queries to us came, of course, because last free update I reported
that for the first two weeks of September we are placing ZNet Sustainer
Commentaries online, on the ZNet top page (www.zmag.org/weluser.htm)
and, indeed, you can find them there, front and center. We hope you will
find the content exceptional. We hope you will like the idea of
receiving a commentary each day (and sometimes two) in your email (which
you can of course turn on and off as you choose). We hope you will like
the idea of being able to access about 1300 past commentaries in a very
easy to navigate manner, and also our zine layout of the most recent
twenty commentaries, always available at a click. We hope you will like
the idea of interacting with other sustainers and with some of our
writers -- including Chomsky and myself -- in our Sustainer Forum
system. And of course, we also hope you will like the idea of providing
some monetary support to ZNet / Z to expand our efforts and operations.
If all this appeals to you, please at least take a look at our
description of the Sustainer Program via its top page link...

http://www.zmag.org/Commentaries/donorform.htm

>From the above you can learn more about our contributing writers, the
forums and other features of the Sustainer Program, and you can join via
secure forms through which you choose your donation level and procedures
-- whether to donate by check or credit card, and whether to do it
monthly, quarterly, or yearly.

Thank you in advance for your support!

And now...the RAWA statement...

----


RAWA Statement on the anniversary of the September 11 tragedy

Fundamentalism is the Enemy of All Civilized Humanity

RAWA joins with the rest of the civilized world in remembering the
innocent lives lost on September 11th, as well as all those others lost
to terrorism and oppression throughout the world. It is with great
sadness that RAWA sees other people experiencing the pain that the
women, children and men of Afghanistan have long suffered at the hands
of fundamentalist terrorists. 

For ten long years the people of Afghanistan -Afghan women in
particular- have been crushed and brutalized, first under the chains and
atrocities of the "Northern Alliance" fundamentalists, then under those
of the Taliban. During all this period, the governments of the Western
powers were bent on finding ways to "work with" these criminals. These
Western governments did not lose much sleep over the daily grind of
abject misery our people were enduring under the domination of these
terrorist bands. To them it did not matter so very much that human
rights and democratic principles were being trampled on a daily basis in
an inconceivable manner. What was important was to "work with" the
religio-fascists to have Central Asian oil pipelines extended to
accessible ports of shipment. 

Immediately after the September 11 tragedy American military might moved
into action to punish its erstwhile hirelings. A captive, bleeding,
devastated, hungry, pauperized, drought-stricken and ill-starred
Afghanistan was bombed into oblivion by the most advanced and
sophisticated weaponry ever created in human history. Innocent lives,
many more than those who lost their lives in the September 11 atrocity,
were taken. Even joyous wedding gatherings were not spared. The Taliban
regime and its al-Qaeda support were toppled without any significant
dent in their human combat resources. What was not done away with was
the sinister shadow of terrorist threat over the whole world and its
alter ego, fundamentalist terrorism. 

Neither opium cultivation nor warlordism have been eradicated in
Afghanistan. There is neither peace nor stability in this tormented
country, nor has there been any relief from the scourges of extreme
pauperization, prostitution, and wanton plunder. Women feel much more
insecure than in the past. The bitter fact that even the personal
security of the President of the country cannot be maintained without
recourse to foreign bodyguards and the recent terrorist acts in our
country speak eloquent volumes about the chaotic and terrorist-ridden
situation of the country. Why is it so? Why has the thunderous uproar in
the aftermath of September 11 resulted in nothing? For the following
reasons which RAWA has reiterated time and again: 



1. For the people of Afghanistan, it is "out of the frying pan, into the
fire". Instead of the Taliban terrorists, Jihadi terrorists of the
"Northern Alliance" have been installed in power. The Jihadi and the
Taliban fundamentalists share a common ideology; their differences are
the usual differences between brethren-in-creed. 
2. For the past more or less twenty years, Osama bin Laden has had
Afghan fundamentalists on his payroll and has been paying their leaders
considerable stipends. He and Mullah Omar, together with a band of
followers equipped with the necessary communication resources, can live
for many years under the protection of different fundamentalist bands in
Afghanistan and Pakistan and continue to plot against the people of
Afghanistan and the rest of humankind. 

3. The Taliban and the al-Qaeda phenomena, as manifestations of an
ideology and a political culture infesting an Islamic country, could
only have been uprooted by a popular insurrection and the strengthening
and coming to power of secular democratic forces. Such a purge cannot be
effected solely with the physical elimination of the likes of Osama and
Mullah Omar. 

The "Northern Alliance" can never sincerely want the total elimination
of the Taliban and the al-Qaeda, as such elimination would mean the end
of the raison d'Ítre of the backing and support extended to them by
foreign forces presently dominant in the country. This was the rationale
behind RAWA's slogan for the overthrow of the Taliban and al-Qaeda
through popular insurrection. Unfortunately, before such popular
insurrection could come about, the Taliban and al-Qaeda forfeited their
positions to the "brethren of the 'Northern Alliance'" without suffering
any crippling decimation. 

With their second occupation of Kabul, the "Northern Alliance" thwarted
any hopes for a radical, meaningful change. They are themselves now the
source and root of insecurity, the disgraceful police atmosphere of the
Loya Jirga, rampant terrorism, gagging of democracy, atrocious
violations of human rights, mounting pauperization, prostitution and
corruption, the flourishing of poppy cultivation, failure of beginning
to reconstruct, and a host of further unlisted evils, too many to
enumerate. 

Oppression and crimes against women are rife in different forms
throughout the country. RAWA has always maintained that the
fundamentalists' rabid hatred of women as equal human beings -be they
fundamentalists of the Jihadi brand or of the Taliban one- is not due
merely to their unhealthy upbringing or morbid mind frame, but emanates
from their religio-fascistic ideological world outlook. As long as such
an ideology exists, propped up by military forces available at its
disposal, neither crazed misogyny nor a myriad of shameful social evils
associated with it can be eradicated. This is not a problem that can be
dealt with by the creation of a "Ministry of Women's Affairs" nor by the
presence of a couple of token women in high government positions. To
hope for the attainment of freedom, democracy and equality within the
framework of a corrupt, religion-based, ethno-chauvinistic system is
either self-delusion or hypocrisy -or both. 

We find no happiness in the fact that RAWA's predictions in regard to
the consequences of the re-domination of the "Northern Alliance" have
once again been borne out. Those who claimed that the "Northern
Alliance" were better than, and therefore preferable to, the Taliban
must wake up and apologise to our people for their noxious sermons. The
establishment of democracy and social justice can be possible only with
the overthrow of fundamentalist domination as a prime precondition. This
cannot be achieved without an organised and irreconcilable campaign of
the women masses against fundamentalism, its agents and apologists. 

Some politically bankrupt entities who have no shame in grovelling to
the "Northern Alliance" in the hope of securing positions and feathering
their nests, label RAWA as "Maoist" and "radical" because of our
decisive and irreconcilable stances and viewpoints. But does the current
situation in the country prove the fallacy of RAWA's positions or do
they give a slap in the face to the ladies and gentleman with the
penchant for being colluding and mealy-mouthed? The assassinations of a
vice president and a cabinet minister and the ban on investigating these
murders, the discovery of mass graves, the banning of women singers and
artists and showing of dancing on TV, the censorship of the media,
arbitrary fatwas of kofr and apostasy against women, gang rapes of even
expatriate women working for international NGOs, the disgusting campaign
of making an idol out of Ahmad Shah Masoud, are these not enough to
bring home the realisation that indulgence and permissiveness towards
rabid dogs only serve to make them more ferocious? 

RAWA's experience in fighting fundamentalism, particularly during the
past 10 years, motivates us to be all the more persistent in our
attempts to mobilise women even in the most remote corners of our
country. At the same time, we shall not desist from pursuing an
irreconcilable policy towards fundamentalism and standing in solidarity
with all pro-democracy forces. We staunchly believe that in addition to
causing the tragic deaths of over 3,000 innocent Americans and
non-Americans and the sorrow and bereavement of tens of thousands more,
the monstrous terrorist attack of September 11 showed the world what a
nefarious pestilence fundamentalism is; it showed the world the sort of
inferno the peoples of Afghanistan, Iran, Algeria, Sudan and other such
countries live in. 

Fundamentalism is the mortal enemy of civilised humanity; to address it
demands the consolidated action of all freedom-loving nations of the
world. The present "world anti-terrorism coalition" has been debased by
innumerable ambiguities and impurities of purpose, motivation and
objectives. The contradictions between world powers will spell its doom.
Therefore, it behoves anti-fundamentalist individuals and organisations
working for social justice the world over to draw together without
hesitation to contain and ultimately stamp out, once and for all, the
vermin of fundamentalism, so that the tragedy of September 11 will never
be repeated, neither in America nor anywhere else. 

RAWA takes pride in the fact that up till now we have been able to
establish contact with a considerable number of anti-terrorist
organisations on all five continents and enjoy their moral and material
support. However, for the purpose of waging a swifter and more
encompassing fight against terrorism, it is necessary for such
solidarity to be expanded and strengthened. In this connection we shake
the hands of all freedom-loving individuals and organisations. 

We would like to avail ourselves of this opportunity to once again
extend our heartfelt condolences to all those who lost their loved ones
in the savage calamity of September 11, as well as to the friends and
families of those innocent compatriots -for all we know, anti-Taliban
and anti-"Northern Alliance"- who were blown to shreds by American
aerial bombardment. We sincerely hope that a vast number of those who
are bereaved and grieving for their loved ones will, sooner or later,
join the ranks of the legions mobilising against fundamentalist fascism
in their respective countries and on an international level. 

No to Al-Qaeda, No to the Taliban, No to the "Northern Alliance"!
Long Live a Free, Democratic and Blossoming Afghanistan!
Victory in the Decisive War to the Very End of Afghan Women Against
Fundamentalism and for Democracy!
Long Live International Solidarity Against Fundamentalist Terrorism!


Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA)
September 11, 2002


-----



Why Do We Provide the Sustainer Program Services only as a Premium for
Donations, rather than giving it all away free?

Well, Z/ZNet asks for donations to support not only the production of
the commentaries by the writers involved and the work of preparing and
mailing them, but also to support the Sustainer conferencing system and
webzine, and to support the maintenance and expansion of Z, ZNet, and
related projects. 

Still, you might wonder, sure, and for those who wish to donate, that's
fine -- but why should I have to pay to get email information or to
access a webzine or a forum system or anything else online? Don't you
folks at Z believe in getting all this stuff out as widely as possible?

The short answer is to simply ask in reply, why should you have to pay
for the videos we provide, the audios, and the print magazine itself? We
would like to put them too in the hands of every person the least bit
interested, and more beyond, as well. But if we did follow that path, if
we didn't find a way to get some revenues while distributing the
materials, shortly we would be broke and no more information would be
forthcoming from us, and so an approach that involves payments is
prerequisite to putting the worthy material in anyone's hands, at all.

Still, for some folks that simple answer isn't going to do it, and so
more needs to be said.

To understand our view on the internet and revenues it is important to
realize that nothing on the internet is truly free. There are
expenses--labor, technical, organizational, and so on--so that revenues
are always generated from somewhere to pay the bills. The issue is not
should one charge users, but where should funds come from to pay the
bills for information creation, packaging, and delivery?

One option, and the one that leads many people to feel like things are
free, is advertising. This is how "free TV" is supported and how
commercial radio and almost all print media and much of the internet is
supported to be either free or very inexpensive, too. It is interesting
that we have never heard any progressive person extol the virtues of
"free television" as a wonderfully progressive institution.

Z knows that relying on advertising, which is really selling users to
advertisers, makes content secondary to commercialism and thereby
corrupts it. Thus, Z has to attract support via donations and/or the
sale of content.
†
But can't people want to use ZNet, but prefer not to donate to it for
perfectly reasonable reasons?†

Of course they can. 

There are many reasonable and sensible reasons why a particular person
might not want to donate to Z/ZNet, and this is so even if he or she is
using ZNet frequently.†But what isn't a good reason for not donating,
supposing of course that you do have the means and do benefit greatly
from the content, is a feeling that other than connection fees†the
internet should be free--so why should any left venture sully it with
paid content?†

Well,  one reason to do so is because there would have been no ZNet
without Z to pay the bills. But there would have been no Z without its
paying subscribers. If doing online distribution reduces subscribers
(which it does) without generating new sources of revenues in their
place (which it won't if we can't collect fees in any way), not just Z
but all left periodicals will decline, and their online efforts will
become dormant as well, and the information they were generating will no
longer be available in any medium, paid or free. 

What will be left, at least at the institutional level, will be
overwhelmingly only those operations that can finance themselves via
advertising ala CBS, and we know what that means, or those that are
totally volunteer, done in people's spare time.

Folks who think information ought to be free and that asking for
donations or fees is wrong, but who also support and want dissident
content, need to rethink their take on things. 

Here is one way to react when you encounter these views.

(1) Free and just, free and fair, free and liberated, free and
equitable, free and participatory, free and democratic, and even free
and non-commercial -- all these juxtapositions, if you encounter them,
are not of synonyms or even of closely related terms, at least not if we
are talking about sense of free that is operative when people talk about
the internet being free, as in not requiring explicit payments..†

TV is free, radio is free (meaning they are paid for by ads and thus by
viewer's and listener's indirect expenditures on products advertised),
and for that matter the "protection" the U.S. military gives its
citizens is free as well (which is to say, is paid for by other than by
direct transactions from us, in this case not by ads, but by taxes). Are
any of these "free" things fair, liberated, equitable, participatory,
democratic, or even non-commercial? 

It is hard to imagine, but many advocates of social justice look at
internet web sites funded by advertising and call them non-commercial
and free, with positive connotations, and then simultaneously call
entreaties to support dissident publishing commercial, pejoratively.
Rethinking this is in order.

(2) Andk, if need be, to hammer this point home in a fashion that may
irritate someone at first, but that nonetheless deserves some serious
consideration, you might gently ask a person who doubts that there
should be fees to web site creaters and providers to consider the
juxtaposition of "free" (meaning demanding no fee and even no entreaty
for donations for diverse projects that one enjoys and benefits from)
and "freeloader" (meaning someone who enjoys benefits from a publicly
available good or service without, however, sharing in their support and
sustenance). 

These two terms, free and freeloader, are far more synonymous, in fact,
than the more benign juxtapositions above that many progressive folks
now have firmly in mind. Indeed, the only thing that stands between
taking something free and being a freeloader is truly not having the
means to pay anything for it, or honestly adjudging that what little
means one has ought to go elsewhere. These are two fine reasons, of
course, to not be a ZNet Sustainer even if one enjoys ZNet's contents,
and no one should be badgered about such choices.

So please, if you encounter folks that don't want to support ZNet, Z,
and the ZNet Commentary Program and all the many more services and
projects that you can imagine us doing with regular financial revenues
-- that's absolutely fine. It is no problem in and of itself, of
course.†Not everyone will or even should like our efforts enough to
support them, even if they are getting good use of them, and also have
the means.

But, if you talk to folks who are getting a lot of their information and
political analysis from progressive and left venues, whether on the
internet or in print or in any other forms, and if they support the
existence of such efforts as essential to seeking justice, but they say
they think that paying for information or giving donations is
commercial, please try to get them to understand the situation more
fully.†

Their support is needed, widely, and not only by us.

Thank you,


===================================This message has been brought to you by ZNet 
(http://www.zmag.org). Visit our site for subscription options.

Reply via email to