On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:46 -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Chris McDonough]
> > I also use this feature but I would be happy to stop using it if it made
> > the code materially simpler to maintain.
> 
> I don't hate the feature, but I hate that it's undocumented, and I hate that
> it's untested.  I particularly hate that the ClientStorage constructor has
> 17 arguments now, and that the docs for its `name` and `storage` arguments
> are incomprehensible when taken together:

<snip>

I certainly don't need the feature enough to do anything except say
"fine by me if it gets ripped out".  The only thing I'd likely need to
do if it were ripped out it make sure Zope's zconfig specializations for
ClientStorage still make sense, which is stupid-simple.

- C


_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev

Reply via email to