Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2005-7-12 18:46 +0100:
>Due to the nastiness Refresh has to perform under the cover even  
>Shane has to admit that it simply is not some "make development  
>faster" panacea.

Shane might (perhaps) admit it but I do not :-)

There is not much "nastiness" that "Refresh" does:

  (Manual) refresh has only a single problem:
  it does not refresh dependent products automatically.

  But this can easily be fixed (provided product dependencies
  are configured correctly).

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -

Reply via email to