[Lalo Martins]
>>> It considers timestamps in the future as infinitely old; so in a
>>> hypotetical database where all transactions are in the future, it would
>>> copy only "reachable" transactions.

[Tim Peters]
>> Offhand that makes sense.  It would be interesting to figure out why
>> it didn't pack anything, but don't have spare time for that ...

> It is in the collector, in case you want to check.
> http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1861

Hmm.  Didn't you say this didn't work for you?  If so, the Collector
comments should say so up front.

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to