>>> It considers timestamps in the future as infinitely old; so in a
>>> hypotetical database where all transactions are in the future, it would
>>> copy only "reachable" transactions.
>> Offhand that makes sense. It would be interesting to figure out why
>> it didn't pack anything, but don't have spare time for that ...
> It is in the collector, in case you want to check.
Hmm. Didn't you say this didn't work for you? If so, the Collector
comments should say so up front.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org