Toby Dickenson wrote at 2005-9-30 16:40 +0100: >On Friday 30 September 2005 11:40, Dieter Maurer wrote: >> We have the need to mount dozens, if not hundreds of ZODBs in a single >> Zope instance. >> >> With the current implementation, each ZODB connection has its own >> independent cache. This makes it very difficult to use the >> available memory efficiently for caching. As the caches are independent, >> a heavily used ZODB cannot use memory assigned to a lightly used ZODB. > >Each ZODB version also has its own cache. There is already a mechanism for >ensuring that lightly used versions do not hold on to memory indefinitely. >That should be much easier, and might just be adequate.
Thank you! But I fear some of dozens (or even hundreds) of storages will not be lightly used. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
