Tim Peters wrote:
> The need for this class has been largely supplanted by the
> ability to subclass directly from dict ...
Yes, that's exactly what I was referring to.
> I agree pop() should be added. Work up a patch, or at least open a bug
I can do the patch, and I should even be able to check it in. Would
> Note that there are two relevant classes, PersistentDict and
> PersistentMapping. The code duplication there sucks (particularly because
> they can-- and do --get out of synch), and one of them should be deprecated.
Was there ever a semantic difference, maybe along the lines of mapping
interface vs dict implementation?
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org