Tim Peters wrote:
[Chris Withers]
...oh well, if only the ZODB cache was RAM-usage-based ratehr than object
count based ;-)

Ya, that's not feasible.  More plausible would be to base ZODB cache targets
on aggregate pickle size; ZODB _could_ know that, and then it would also be
strongly related to how a ZEO cache's size is measured (the ZEO cache size
limit is given in bytes, and by far the bulk of those bytes are consumed by

All good, but still never gonna happen, right? *wry grinz*


Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
           - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to