Chris McDonough wrote at 2006-3-2 22:03 -0500:
> ...
>The "ZODB" egg  
>might include both ZODB and ZEO (these are linked inextricably) which  
>depends on the "persistence" distribution.  Transaction should be  
>dependency-free (but probably isn't, I haven't gotten that far yet).

While ZEO is of no use without ZODB, the inverse is not true:
ZODB might very well be interesting without ZEO.
I would not bundle ZEO and ZODB together...

>persistence-3.6.0.egg (which would include persistent and BTrees  

I would prefer if "BTrees" could remain a package (rather than a module).

>zodblib-3.6.0.egg (which would include ZODB and ZODB packages).
                                        ^^^^     ^^^^

sure, you means something different...

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -

Reply via email to