David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim and Roderigo! This is encouraging news. I have been putting much
thought into this also. There is a downside to refactoring ZEO in that
there are many folks heavily dependent on it and also reasonably happy
The refactoring we are talking about won't effect them directly. It
will change the internal implementation. The only effect might be
to make it easier to provide new features in the future.
On the notion of multiple independent loops for twisted, I believe there
are possibilities, some interested folks, and a patch I found that could
be evaluated. The work would be murky as Glyph has pointed out - but he
has offered to review tests for this as well.
Cool. Historical note: I had to modify asyncore to allow it to have
minimal support for multiple loops.
To repeat what I said in an earlier thread, I want the refactoring
to allow Tisted's use without requiring it.
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org