Adam Groszer wrote:
Somehow relevant to the subject I just found an article on Wickert's
http://www.wiggy.net/ , "Using a seperate Data.fs for the catalog"
The win here is actually partitioning the object cache...
Similar wins could be achieved without making backup/pack/etc more
complicated by making the object cache more intelligent:
- based on size of objects, not just number
- memory limiting (including intra-transaction)
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org