On Dec 7, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:

Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
It sounds like I should write some pickle and cPickle tests and we should update the ZODB trunk to take advantage of this. (/me fears gettimg mired in Python 3.)

Would you do that on Python 2.4, 2.5 or ... ?
I would do it on "?". ;)

I'd help with pleasure...

I guess I'd need to do it for 2.4, 2.5, trunk and hope that pickle hasn't been ported to Python 3 yet. :)
This is just a fairly simple test, so shouldn't be a big deal.

... but I fear it would take you longer to explain what to do than to do it.

Maybe. I bet all that's needed is to reuse the existing persistent_id tests using inst_persiistent_id. I haven't looked at the tests yet. At which point, one might a test to distinguish the 2 cases. And, of course, eventually, the tests will need to get checked in. I can do that. You might be able to write the tests without much input from me. OTOH, I'll get to them eventually. :)


Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to