Makes sense.

Is zc.FileStorage an alternative packing strategy?  Does it
use less memory?

http://svn.zope.org/zc.FileStorage/dev/src/zc/FileStorage/

cheers
alan

On Dec 17, 2007 8:29 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Alan Runyan wrote:
> ...
> >  not believe zeopack will bring the entire database into memory at
> > once.  It may/
> > probably brings the index into memory.
> >
> > Suggestion: run zeopack and zeoserver on a separate machine or
> > allocate more
> > memory to your zeoserver process.
>
>
> zeopack doesn't consume any reasources to speak of. It just tells the
> *server* to pack.  The resources are consumed by the server.
>
>
> Jim
>
> --
> Jim Fulton
> Zope Corporation
>
>
>



-- 
Alan Runyan
Enfold Systems, Inc.
http://www.enfoldsystems.com/
phone: +1.713.942.2377x111
fax: +1.832.201.8856
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev

Reply via email to