Makes sense. Is zc.FileStorage an alternative packing strategy? Does it use less memory?
http://svn.zope.org/zc.FileStorage/dev/src/zc/FileStorage/ cheers alan On Dec 17, 2007 8:29 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Alan Runyan wrote: > ... > > not believe zeopack will bring the entire database into memory at > > once. It may/ > > probably brings the index into memory. > > > > Suggestion: run zeopack and zeoserver on a separate machine or > > allocate more > > memory to your zeoserver process. > > > zeopack doesn't consume any reasources to speak of. It just tells the > *server* to pack. The resources are consumed by the server. > > > Jim > > -- > Jim Fulton > Zope Corporation > > > -- Alan Runyan Enfold Systems, Inc. http://www.enfoldsystems.com/ phone: +1.713.942.2377x111 fax: +1.832.201.8856 _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev