On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 00:00 -0400, Manuel Vazquez Acosta wrote:
> Roché Compaan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 07:36 +0200, Roché Compaan wrote:
> >> I'll update my blog post with the final stats and let you know when it
> >> is ready.
> > I'll have to keep running these tests because the more I run them the
> > faster the ZODB becomes ;-) Would you have guessed that the ZODB is
> > faster at both insertion and lookups than Postgres?
> > http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za/Members/roche/where-im-calling-from/zodb-benchmarks-revisited
> > Lookups are even faster then what I originally reported. Lookup times
> > averages at 2 milliseconds (0.002s) on 10 million objects.
> > I think somebody else should run these tests as well and validate the
> > methodology behind them, otherwise I'm spreading lies.
> I'm very interested in your results. I'm assessing whether or not
> implement an application with ZODB. I have had a previous good
> experience, but was in a minor project. Now I need very fast lookups and
> retrievals, possibly distributed DB system and as easy as ZODB.
> Have done more tests recently?
Not yet, they are very time consuming. I plan to do the same tests over
ZEO next to determine what overhead ZEO introduces.
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org