Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-9-12 10:31 +0200:
>> anyone having experiences with the performance of Relstorage on Zope 
>> installations which heavy parallel writes (which is often a bottleneck). 
>> Does Relstorage provide any significant advantages over ZEO.
> As "Relstorage" emulates "FileStorage" behaviour for writes/commits,
> using the same storage global lock, you should not see a significant
> change. Maybe, writing the "log" temporary file is avoided.

Agreed; I grabbed the ZEO/FileStorage commit algorithm and used it 
without significant changes in RelStorage.  If there are any performance 
differences, they are due to optimizations in coding, networking, etc.


For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -

Reply via email to