On Nov 4, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Benji York wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A few months back, there was a lot of discussion here about BTree
>> performance.  I got a sense that maximum BTree-node and bucket sizes
>> should be increased.  Does anyone have recommendations for new sizes?
> It'd be cool if the bucket size could be dynamic (say governed by an
> attribute on the BTree), but I suspect that is dramatically out of  
> scope
> for what you were planning on doing.

I have a list of projects I might try to do for 3.9.  One would be to  
make BTrees subclassable
and to modify BTrees to get these limits from class attributes.  But  
whether I get to this or not,
if there are more sensible defaults, it would make sense to use them.


Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to