On Nov 4, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Benji York wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A few months back, there was a lot of discussion here about BTree
>> performance. I got a sense that maximum BTree-node and bucket sizes
>> should be increased. Does anyone have recommendations for new sizes?
> It'd be cool if the bucket size could be dynamic (say governed by an
> attribute on the BTree), but I suspect that is dramatically out of
> for what you were planning on doing.
I have a list of projects I might try to do for 3.9. One would be to
make BTrees subclassable
and to modify BTrees to get these limits from class attributes. But
whether I get to this or not,
if there are more sensible defaults, it would make sense to use them.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org