Hi there, when jotting down a thought about bug 240381 I got the feedback that caring about the issue isn't among the (current) priorities of ZODB development.
Unfortunately, I don't know what those priorities are. In addition, when going through the bug tracker this morning I found that the triage of bugs isn't executed very well currently and I'm a bit wary of trying to do something that will be shot down with a "not our priorities" quickly. I'm trying to make up time to help where I can and I'm happy to do some leg work. For example I find it extremely important to have a well organised bug database. So one thing I'm trying to do is keep the list of untriaged bugs down so that when someone does have time to work on a fix for a bug he can easily find those that are important/urgent and real issues not duplicates or unreproducable things. This involves moving bugs out of the "new" status as quickly as possible. For example #183203 has been prioritized to medium but is still sitting there as new. The content doesn't hint to it as "confirmed" so I'd suggest moving this over to "incomplete". I find those thoughts to be relatively obvious, but I'd rather not keep "contributing" in my spare time with things that aren't of "priority" to the project. And again: asides from the (to me) obvious cleaning of the bug database. What are the priorities? Christian -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
