when jotting down a thought about bug 240381 I got the feedback that
caring about the issue isn't among the (current) priorities of ZODB
Unfortunately, I don't know what those priorities are.
In addition, when going through the bug tracker this morning I found
that the triage of bugs isn't executed very well currently and I'm a bit
wary of trying to do something that will be shot down with a "not our
I'm trying to make up time to help where I can and I'm happy to do some
leg work. For example I find it extremely important to have a well
organised bug database. So one thing I'm trying to do is keep the list
of untriaged bugs down so that when someone does have time to work on a
fix for a bug he can easily find those that are important/urgent and
real issues not duplicates or unreproducable things.
This involves moving bugs out of the "new" status as quickly as
possible. For example #183203 has been prioritized to medium but is
still sitting there as new. The content doesn't hint to it as
"confirmed" so I'd suggest moving this over to "incomplete".
I find those thoughts to be relatively obvious, but I'd rather not keep
"contributing" in my spare time with things that aren't of "priority" to
And again: asides from the (to me) obvious cleaning of the bug database.
What are the priorities?
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org