On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Shane Hathaway <sh...@hathawaymix.org> wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Erik Dahl <ed...@zenoss.com> wrote:
>> ...
>>>
>>> I haven't dove into the relstorage yet but have heard it will perform
>>> better.
>>
>> It doesn't.  See:
>>
>>  https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2009-October/012758.html
>
> Since you posted those numbers, I have worked hard to solve the performance
> issues you identified.  I have improved both RelStorage and the performance
> test, which is now a separate project (released on PyPI) named zodbshootout.
>  Your numbers may apply to RelStorage 1.2, but not 1.4.
>
> See:
>
> http://shane.willowrise.com/archives/relstorage-1-4-0b1-and-zodbshootout/

I won't take the time now to analyze the new test, although I will ask
a couple of questions:

First, in your results, you show cold, warm and hot numbers. Do these
correspond to my cold, hot and steamin numbers?

Second, does the test still write and then read roughly the same
amount of data as before?

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev

Reply via email to