On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
>>> If you want to experiment with the idea anyway, then writing a "wrapper"
>>> storage is probably the way to go: DemoStorage is one such beast, as is
>>> the BlobStorage itself.
>> I don't consider the wrapper approach to have been very effective for
>> BlobStorage, although it was a reasonable thing to try at the time.
>> BlobStorage is likely to go way.
>> (This comment should not be construed as supporting the idea of implementing
>> some sort of blob-storage back end using DVCS.)
> I'm having troube with the last sentence: do you really mean you don't
> like the idea of blobs-in-DVCS? Or did you drop the second part of a
> double negative inadvertently?
I was trying to avoid being negative by stating the absence of a
positive. I doubt it is a good idea but don't want to spend the time
required to be sure I don't like it.
I wanted to state some technical observations without being
misinterpreted as supporting the project.
It appears this is moot anyway.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org