On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Alan Runyan <runy...@gmail.com> wrote: ... >> No it can't. ZODB isn't a namespace package and can't be one without >> breaking backward compatibility. > > Should it be a namespace package over the long term?
Not IMO. That's partly because I think ZODB should be small. I also don't think that just because something adds value to an underlying framework, it should be added to a framework namespace package. Jim -- Jim Fulton _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev