On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Alan Runyan <runy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No it can't. ZODB isn't a namespace package and can't be one without
>> breaking backward compatibility.
> Should it be a namespace package over the long term?
Not IMO. That's partly because I think ZODB should be small.
I also don't think that just because something adds value to an underlying
framework, it should be added to a framework namespace package.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org