On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Alan Runyan <runy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> No it can't. ZODB isn't a namespace package and can't be one without
>> breaking backward compatibility.
> Should it be a namespace package over the long term?

Not IMO.  That's partly because I think ZODB should be small.
I also don't think that just because something adds value to an underlying
framework, it should be added to a framework namespace package.


Jim Fulton
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to