On 04/11/2010 14:50, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Actually, I think it should be used, at least for applications with
> high availability requirements. For applications like our's (ZC's)
> it amounts to a "don't be stupid" setting.
> For some applications, it's better to risk inconsistency than to have
> your application grind to a halt.  I consider it an emergency device
> though, which is why I'd set it pretty high.

...except that it logs at INFO ;-)

Can you raise that, or would you mind if I raised that to CRITICAL?
(it does feel like a CRITICAL kind of thing, based on the information 
you've provided today)



Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to