On 04/11/2010 14:50, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Actually, I think it should be used, at least for applications with
> high availability requirements. For applications like our's (ZC's)
> it amounts to a "don't be stupid" setting.
>
> For some applications, it's better to risk inconsistency than to have
> your application grind to a halt. I consider it an emergency device
> though, which is why I'd set it pretty high.
...except that it logs at INFO ;-)
Can you raise that, or would you mind if I raised that to CRITICAL?
(it does feel like a CRITICAL kind of thing, based on the information
you've provided today)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
