On 18/11/2010 16:48, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Leonardo Santagada<santag...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Chris Withers<ch...@simplistix.co.uk> >> wrote: >>> On 18/11/2010 15:39, Marius Gedminas wrote: >>>> About the only noticeable difference -- other than the obvious memory >>>> growth >>> >>> What obvious memory growth? >> >> The one from pointers and anything related to memory going from 32bits >> to 64bits in size. Py_objects get fatter because of that. > > For Zope based applications I've generally seen 50% to 100% memory > growth when moving to 64bit. That's why we stick to 32bit for a number > of memory hungry applications (*wink* Plone).
Right, but, even if the MySQL server is 64-bit, if the clients are 32-bit, they won't have this problem, will they? Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev