On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote: ... >> Well, I don't have time to chase BTrees. This could always be done in >> ZODB 5. :) > > I could help chop BTrees out, if that would be useful: most of the > effort will be purely subtractive in the ZODB package (I don't think > anything depends on BTrees).
FileStorage uses BTrees for it's in-memory index. MappingStorage used BTrees. There are ZODB tests that use BTrees, but I suppose they could be fixed. I just don't think the win is that great in separating BTrees at this time. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
