On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
>> Well, I don't have time to chase BTrees. This could always be done in
>> ZODB 5. :)
> I could help chop BTrees out, if that would be useful: most of the
> effort will be purely subtractive in the ZODB package (I don't think
> anything depends on BTrees).
FileStorage uses BTrees for it's in-memory index.
MappingStorage used BTrees.
There are ZODB tests that use BTrees,
but I suppose they could be fixed.
I just don't think the win is that great
in separating BTrees at this time.
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org