>And new semantics to allow that would have one twist: you really only
>want to allow this zone-requested loopback when the filesystem to mount
>is share(1M)'d to the zone. You can't allow zones to have arbitrary
>loopback mounts created upon request. So this might need support for
>share -F lofs and corresponding support to (auto)mount global zone lofs
>exports in local zones.
The global zone knows all this and could deal with this gracefully
using some form of protocol that establishes not only what the zone wants
to mount but also where.
More interesting is it when a local zone shares something and another
zone wants to mount it ....
zones-discuss mailing list