On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello Brian,
> Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 8:31:06 PM, you wrote:
> BK> With the performance boosts included in recent solaris versions I'm
> BK> told that there's not much of a difference between handing the database
> BK> raw devices vs. using a filesystem anymore.
> BK> To test this out, my customer would like to try both ufs and vxfs
> BK> filesystems in the global zone and lofs mount them to a local zone
> BK> and test the database on that lofs mount.
> BK> Are there any options that should be supplied for the lofs mount and
> BK> are there any options for the ufs and/or vxfs mounts that should be
> BK> employed to assure the performance should be close to raw devices?
> 1. lofs is probably a bad idea - mount them directly into a zone
lofs is the only supported option for vxfs.
zones-discuss mailing list