On Tue 31 Oct 2006 at 03:24PM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > It seems reasonable to amend this case to say: > > 1. > Any process with priv_sys_resource running in the global zone's > system project (project 0) will not subject to project.* or zone.* > resource controls. System daemons which wish to be subject to the > global zone's resource controls can drop priv_sys_resource.
This "feels" risky for a patch... the effect here is to "un-manage" things which the customer may be expecting to be resource managed, potentially including a workload. Or is the point that no-one using RM will be relying on the system project to limit things? This implies that can't give the system project 10 (or 100) shares after this proposal? -dp -- Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org