On Tue 31 Oct 2006 at 03:24PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> It seems reasonable to amend this case to say:
> Any process with priv_sys_resource running in the global zone's
> system project (project 0) will not subject to project.* or zone.*
> resource controls. System daemons which wish to be subject to the
> global zone's resource controls can drop priv_sys_resource.
This "feels" risky for a patch... the effect here is to "un-manage"
things which the customer may be expecting to be resource managed,
potentially including a workload. Or is the point that no-one using
RM will be relying on the system project to limit things?
This implies that can't give the system project 10 (or 100) shares
after this proposal?
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
zones-discuss mailing list