Hi all, Can someone let me know whether a non global zone can have multiple IP addresses ? If so can it be serviced by 2 NIC's with IPMP running in the global zone. eg: global IP's are
ce0 x.x.x.1 ce0:5 x.x.y.10 Zone1 to have x.x.x.10 using ce0 and also service x.x.y.20 using ce0:5 I have asked the same question previously (attached below) without any luck with VLAN tagging but this time I'm trying to simplify the problem. Then I can get the VLAN tagging working. I am at customer and customer keen to have this done. Rgds Roshan ----- Original Message ----- From: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, November 6, 2006 11:49 am Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging. To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > > I have VLAN tagging working OK THanks to the James Carlson, Mike > Gerdts, Steffen Weiberle in particular. > Now I have a further question and similar help will be muchly > appreciated. > I have IPMP in 2 interfaces. eg: > Global Zone IP address 10.10.10.5 (IPMP real) > ce0 10.10.10.6 (IPMP test) > ce1 10.10.10.7 (IPMP test) > > zone1 IP 10.10.10.10 > zone2 IP 10.10.10.20 > > Currently I have ce610000 and ce610001 configured for the above > and working OK with zones IP's fine. > > Now I like the Same IPMP interfaces ce0 and ce1 as above to > service another IP for global and zones. eg: > > 10.10.20.5 for the global zone > 10.10.20.10 for the zone1 > 10.10.20.20 for the zone2 > > I assume this is possible. I tried couple of shots at it. But > fails. Can someone kindly help./. > > Roshan > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:18 pm > Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging. > To: James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > > > > > Guys, > > > > Yes, the problem seems to be CR 6367840. As long as the IPMP > > interfaces are in FAILED mode non global zones will not boot > after > > configuration. > > Have fixed the network and all seems to be fine. > > > > Thanks > > > > Roshan > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:41 pm > > Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging. > > To: Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, zones- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Mike Gerdts writes: > > > > On 10/23/06, Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > zonecfg:sz44bsdvapdqc02:net> set address=10.165.20.35/23 > > > > > > > > That should be: > > > > > > > > set address=10.165.20.35 > > > > > > > > You will then need an entry in the global zone's > /etc/netmasks to > > > > ensure that the netmask is set properly as the zone is booted. > > > > > > There's nothing wrong with CIDR notation here. In fact, I'd > > recommend> that users prefer CIDR and shy away from the ancient > > and feeble > > > /etc/netmasks interface. > > > > > > See the zonecfg(1M) man page for details. > > > > > > That's not the problem the user is seeing. The problem the > user is > > > experienced appears to be CR 6367840 -- fixed in Nevada, but > not > > S10.> > > > -- > > > James Carlson, KISS Network > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive > > > > > > 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 > > > MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 > 781 > > > 442 1677 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zones-discuss mailing list > > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > > > _______________________________________________ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
