Stefan,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I found the way infact I wasted a day trying to get 
it working because zonecfg add net only support one entry at a time. 
Each time you have to end add net and then do a add net again for the 2nd IP. 
Which is what caused me to seek help.

Thanks again.

Roshan



----- Original Message -----
From: Steffen Weiberle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2006 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and multiple IP address
To: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

> Roshan Perera wrote On 11/07/06 05:35,:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Can someone let me know whether a non global zone can have 
> multiple IP addresses ? 
> 
> Yes. Yes.
> 
> If so can it be serviced by
> > 2 NIC's with IPMP running in the global zone. 
> 
> Yes. I *must* be managed via IPMP from the global zone. When you 
> configure the non-global zone, you 
> only need to indicate one interface of the IPMP group.
> 
> Steffen
> 
> eg: global IP's are
> > 
> > ce0      x.x.x.1
> > ce0:5   x.x.y.10
> > 
> > Zone1 to have x.x.x.10 using ce0 and also service x.x.y.20 using 
> ce0:5> 
> > I have asked the same question previously (attached below) 
> without any luck with VLAN tagging but this time I'm trying to 
> simplify the problem. Then I can get the VLAN tagging working.
> > 
> > I am at customer and customer keen to have this done. 
> > 
> > Rgds
> > 
> > Roshan
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Monday, November 6, 2006 11:49 am
> > Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging.
> > To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > 
> > 
> >>I have VLAN tagging working OK THanks to the James Carlson, Mike 
> >>Gerdts, Steffen Weiberle in particular.
> >>Now I have a further question and similar help will be muchly 
> >>appreciated.
> >>I have IPMP in 2 interfaces.    eg:
> >>Global Zone IP address      10.10.10.5 (IPMP real)
> >>                           ce0      10.10.10.6 (IPMP test)
> >>                           ce1      10.10.10.7 (IPMP test)
> >>
> >>zone1 IP 10.10.10.10
> >>zone2 IP 10.10.10.20
> >>
> >>Currently I have ce610000 and ce610001 configured for the above 
> >>and working OK with zones IP's fine.
> >>
> >>Now I like the Same IPMP interfaces ce0 and ce1 as above to 
> >>service another IP for global and zones. eg: 
> >>
> >>10.10.20.5 for the global zone
> >>10.10.20.10 for the zone1
> >>10.10.20.20 for the zone2
> >>
> >>I assume this is possible. I tried couple of shots at it. But 
> >>fails. Can someone kindly help./.
> >>
> >>Roshan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Date: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:18 pm
> >>Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging.
> >>To: James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> >>
> >>
> >>>Guys,
> >>>
> >>>Yes, the problem seems to be CR 6367840. As long as the IPMP 
> >>>interfaces are in FAILED mode non global zones will not boot 
> >>
> >>after 
> >>
> >>>configuration.
> >>>Have fixed the network and all seems to be fine.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks
> >>>
> >>>Roshan
> >>>
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Date: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:41 pm
> >>>Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging.
> >>>To: Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Cc: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, zones-
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>>Mike Gerdts writes:
> >>>>
> >>>>>On 10/23/06, Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>zonecfg:sz44bsdvapdqc02:net> set address=10.165.20.35/23
> >>>>>
> >>>>>That should be:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>set address=10.165.20.35
> >>>>>
> >>>>>You will then need an entry in the global zone's 
> >>
> >>/etc/netmasks to
> >>
> >>>>>ensure that the netmask is set properly as the zone is booted.
> >>>>
> >>>>There's nothing wrong with CIDR notation here.  In fact, I'd 
> >>>
> >>>recommend> that users prefer CIDR and shy away from the ancient 
> >>>and feeble
> >>>
> >>>>/etc/netmasks interface.
> >>>>
> >>>>See the zonecfg(1M) man page for details.
> >>>>
> >>>>That's not the problem the user is seeing.  The problem the 
> >>
> >>user is
> >>
> >>>>experienced appears to be CR 6367840 -- fixed in Nevada, but 
> >>
> >>not 
> >>
> >>>S10.> 
> >>>
> >>>>-- 
> >>>>James Carlson, KISS Network                    
> >>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive    
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>>71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
> >>>>MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 
> >>
> >>781 
> >>
> >>>>442 1677
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>zones-discuss mailing list
> >>>zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>zones-discuss mailing list
> >>zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> >>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > zones-discuss mailing list
> > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zones-discuss mailing list
> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> 
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to