[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> > Are you sure? "lofs" generally missors the entire tree below the
> >> > mountpoint and not just the toplevel mount.
> >> Doh; I tried with nfs mounts. You're right.
> >I did propose to add a "nofollow" option to the lofs mount long ago.
> >If we had it, we did not need to use NFS for these kind of mounts.
> Unless I misread, it was the intention to mount the whole subtree and not
> just the filesystem.
Then NFS would be the wrong aproach, but maybe I did missread it.
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
zones-discuss mailing list