[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
> >James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> > Are you sure?  "lofs" generally missors the entire tree below the
> >> > mountpoint and not just the toplevel mount.
> >>
> >> Doh; I tried with nfs mounts.  You're right.
> >
> >I did propose to add a "nofollow" option to the lofs mount long ago.
> >If we had it, we did not need to use NFS for these kind of mounts.
>
>
> Unless I misread, it was the intention to mount the whole subtree and not
> just the filesystem.

Then NFS would be the wrong aproach, but maybe I did missread it.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to