Hi, is this bug solved already for SPARC as well?
Sunsolve mentions Patch 127111-02, but the Patch Description does not include 6608977. I tried Solaris 10 08/07 with the recent patch cluster including 127111-02, but using match for device entries still does not work. Best regards, Axel *********************************************************************** Axel Blazejewski Account Consultant Sun Microsystems GmbH Brandenburgerstr. 2 40880 Ratingen GERMANY Tel: (++49 2102) 4511-532 Tel2: (++49 174) 301 4078 Fax: (++49 2102) 499516 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sun.de *********************************************************************** Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering Dan Price wrote: > On Mon 01 Oct 2007 at 01:14PM, John Chase wrote: > >> This has just been escalated as a P1 bug in 8/07. >> >> > > Indeed. And please accept our apologies that this bug slipped out. This > was a case where a late performance fix wound up impacting correctness. > We're still assessing why our test suite (and our engineering) did not > catch this problem. > > S10 8/07 is also supposed to have a fix for device removal from zones. I > authored the original fix. In the process of that fix being ported back > to Solaris 10, it was merged with BrandZ code, and at that point that fix > *also* became broken. We're working on a fix for that, as well. > > So, stay tuned. We've been sorting this out for about a week now, and are > at work on getting a patch out as fast as possible. For contract > customers, filing an escalation on bug 6608977 should get you access to > binary relief (in the form of an IDR) as soon as it is available. > > As you may know, there is a huge amount of new zones functionality in S10 > 8/07, so this regression is particularly humbling. Again, please accept > our apologies. > > Someone earlier stated that this was also broken in SXDE-- as far as > I know that is *not* the case. One of the reasons this has been a > troublesome area is that in Nevada the /dev zones implementation is > radically different from S10, due to the existence of the "devnames" > project in Nevada. Hence the S10 and Nevada code is pretty in this > area. > > -dp > > _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
