Jeff Cheeney wrote:
> Maybe someone on the install or zones discussion lists can help answer 
> this question.
> Giovanni Schmid wrote:
>> I have read different articles/docs/posts about solaris zones and 
>> liveupgrade issues until now; however, I have some doubts about the right 
>> way to deploy liveupgrade boot environments in the following case.
>> I have a system with two disks configured as "mirrors" (that is, the same 
>> fdisk partition and VTOC).
>> On the primary disk, I installed Solaris 10 8/07 with two sparse root zones, 
>> say Z1 and Z2. Just two file systems were settled on the primary disk: an 
>> UFS mounted on /, and a ZFS pool mirroring  slice 4 of the two disks and 
>> mounted on /zfspool on the 1st disk. The UFS is intended to contain all but 
>> user's homes. These are served through a ZFS, namely /zfspool/users/home. 
>> Only zone Z2 inherits this ZFS, via the "add fs" setting.
>> All that premised,  my questions are:
>> What is the correct way of using Live Upgrade for this case ? Would 
>> something like:
>> # lucreate -c bootenv1 -m /:c2d0s0:ufs -n bootenv2
>> be sufficient ? That is, will Z2 in bootenv2 "see"  /zfspool/users/home ?

zfs with live upgrade isn't properly supported yet, but a simple shared
zfs file system shared across BEs does work without hickups.

If your zonepaths aren't on that zfs file system, this should be a
working scenario.


>> Any help is appreciated !
>> g.s
>> This message posted from
>> _______________________________________________
>> storage-discuss mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> install-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to