The 9/07 release appears to be for X86 only. The 8/07 release appears to be for Sparc or X86. The 9/07 release is also titled " Express Developers Edition 9/07".
Apparently not a release I can use. Thanks for the quick feedback. When is the next release for Sparc due out? Paul -----Original Message----- >From: "Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Dec 21, 2007 9:15 AM >To: Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], email@example.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] [zfs-discuss] 3510 Array and ZFS/Zones > >Richard Elling wrote: >> Morris Hooten wrote: >>> I looked through the solarsinternals zfs best practices and not >>> completly sure >>> of the best scenario. >>> >> >> ok, perhaps we should add some clarifications... >> >>> I have a Solaris 10 6/06 Generic_125100-10 box with attached 3510 array >>> and would like to use zfs on it. Should I create multiple logical disks >>> thru the raid >>> controller then create zfs raid file systems across the LD's? >>> >>> >> >> That method will work ok. Many people do this with various RAID >> arrays. We can't answer the question "is it the best way?" because we >> would need more detailed information on what you are trying to >> accomplish and how you want to make design trade-offs. So for now, >> I would say it works just like you would expect. >> >>> Can I also migrate zones that are on a ufs file system now into a newly >>> created zfs file system >>> although knowing the limitations with zones and zfs in 06/06? >>> >> >> Zone limitations with ZFS should be well documented in the admin >> guides. Currently, the install and patch process is not ZFS aware, which >> might cause you some difficulty with upgrading or patching. There are >> alternative methods to solve this problem, but you should be aware of the >> current limitation. > >the patch to fix the patch of zones on zfs is pending. >119254/119255 revision 49, we hope to release this in the coming days ( >maybe by COB today even ) >> >>> Recommendations? >>> >> >> Use Solaris 10 9/07. It has more than a year's worth of improvements >> and enhancements to Solaris. >I think you mean 8/07, ( update 4 ) release? >But yes this release is most advised, >Enda >> -- richard >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zfs-discuss mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > >_______________________________________________ >zones-discuss mailing list >firstname.lastname@example.org _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list email@example.com