My english should not good enough to make you understand.
STOP please to write zonepath on ZFS is supported. Everytime you say
that, the next sentence is to say "but with limitations, blabla".
How many customer made the error to use ZFS as zonepath, and few
months later got a "no way" when asking how to patch or upgrade ?
I'm sorry to be so critic, but I'm pretty sure (I said pretty !) that
U3 documentations never states the fact that patching would be
difficult. And the worse is what patching strategies/technics are
becoming...ok new patching technologies are an amazing box of
innovations, but you didn't think of customer which tries to trust you
from the beginning.
Just take a look to the sequence :
- Solaris 10u3 was declared mature, ZFS included, etc, etc. At
same time, SAMs told to their customers that S8 is becoming so old,
they should think to migrate to S10
- S10u3 stated that you CAN put zonepath on ZFS, but you may
difficulties to upgrade. The deal is : use ZFS on SAN and simplify
zonepath transfer from one host to another, or work with SVM metaset.
But at this stage, we thought that we could live without easy upgrade
by patching...LU with zonepath on ZFS would come a day.
- There was 2 releases between u3 and u6, and you're telling
have to wait again ?
Do you really think you were right to say zfs for zonepath is
Send a survey to support teams in regions, I would be curious to see
No, you can't continue, please ! Give us zfs zonepath !
01010101 01001110 01001001 01011000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +33 6 7981 4486
http://www.guses.org - French Speaking (Open)Solaris User Group
http://www.solaris-fr.org - French OpenSolaris Wiki
zones-discuss mailing list