On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Tommy McNeely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Zones experts,
> We are attempting to create a new data center architecture that favors
> virtualization with zones. Previously, if we wanted to have zones from
> different security contexts (front-end, back-end, internet, etc), they
> had to be in different physical machines (or LDOMS). Now that we have
> the ability (ok, as of s10u4, but we have been busy) to use ipfilter
> between zones on the same host, we believe there may be enough
> separation to have zones in different security contexts on the same
> global-zone.
> I would like to get people's feedback on what they would think of
> creating the ability to have ipfilter rules, that would normally be
> located in ipf.conf in the global zone, inside the zonecfg. When the
> zone is brought "online" it could pipe the rules into "ipf -f -" or
> something. I am thinking the zonecfg seems like a good place to store
> them because when I want to "move" a zone from one machine to another,
> I would prefer the firewall came along with the zone.
> We have discussed using vnic interfaces (crossbow?), but I don't
> believe thats integrated yet? Besides, we don't really trust the
> application administrator (zone administrator) with the firewall, so
> we'd like to keep its configuration in the global zone, which I assume
> would still work even with vnic's.
> QUESTION: If we put the firewall (ipf.conf) inside the zone and use a
> private IP instance, can they can put a "pass out quick on vnic0 keep
> state" and they have the ability to connect to any other zone on the
> same machine? I know that rule in the global zone makes it that way,
> but maybe ip stack instances fix that?

Crossbow is not a feature in S10. You mentioned the use of S10U4
above. In that context, the simple answer to your question is "no,
because VNICs don't exist."

zones-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to