Jerry Jelinek wrote: > Thanks for looking at this. I'll take a look > at each of your recommendations. One factor > is that we plan on backporting this to S10, so > I want to keep things working on that release > with a minimum of changes.
Erm... the warnings returned by $ ksh93 -n <scriptname> # apply to ksh88 (e.g. /usr/bin/ksh in Solaris <= 11/B106 and /usr/xpg4/bin/sh), too. This features does not enforce any feature outside the POSIX shell standard (but checks - if they are used - ksh88&&ksh93-specific features, too). Or short: These issues should be fixed for Solaris 10, too (as a side-effect you get more performance for the script (even on Solaris 10), too). ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list email@example.com