On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 19:55, Nicolas Dorfsman <n...@unikservice.eu> wrote:
> Le 6 avr. 09 à 19:35, Alexander Skwar a écrit :
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 13:46, Nicolas Dorfsman <n...@unikservice.eu>
>>> I'm waiting for some patch to allow non-local zones to be located
>>> out of the rpool before upgrading my customer mainframe
>>> Is there anybody here who knows if or when it'd be available ?
>> Is it not allowed to have non-global zones on an arbitrary
>> zpool? Who says so?
>> I'm curious, because my zone roots are NOT located on
>> rpool and things *seem* to work fine. Or am I running into
>> some sort of problem by doing this?
> You could read :
I *could* :)
> In other words : if you never apply patchs, everything's fine. If you'd
> like to patch, you may need to use some trick (like detaching zone and
> re-attaching them on a OS supporting your conf).
Thanks a lot, I wasn't actually aware of that limitation.
Learn something new every day... :/
So...now we're friend you and me, waiting for a patch. :)
Yes, seems like. Thanks a lot for reading the important part to
me. I appreciate it!
[ Soc. => http://twitter.com/alexs77 | http://www.plurk.com/alexs77 ]
[ Mehr => http://zyb.com/alexws77 ]
[ Chat => Jabber: alexw...@jabber80.com | Google Talk: a.sk...@gmail.com ]
[ Mehr => AIM: alexws77 ]
Sent from Winterthur, ZH, Switzerland
zones-discuss mailing list