I think this is the same issue as CR 6798104. There is a workaround you
can try which is documented in the report, which is use a df utility
....
Get a private copy of df from a Solaris 10 8/07 or 120011-14 and use the
*private* copy when you need to check on the filesystem status.
*** DO NOT replace the df binary that comes with S10U6 with an older version ***
....
Ellard Roush wrote:
Hi,
The question raised by Sunil seems to be a zones question.
Does anyone have an explanation or is this a bug ?
Regards,
Ellard
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: df -h in zone cluster
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:28:38 -0400
From: Sunil Sohani <sunil.soh...@sun.com>
To: sunclus...@sun.com
Hi,
IHAC running "zone clusters". They are are running some monitoring
software within zone cluster which does "df -h" to monitor disk space.
Here is sample output:
# df -h
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/ 0K 8.1G 13G 39% /
/dev 21G 8.1G 13G 39% /dev
/lib 31G 9.6G 21G 32% /lib
/platform 31G 9.6G 21G 32% /platform
/sbin 31G 9.6G 21G 32% /sbin
/usr 31G 9.6G 21G 32% /usr
/usr/local 31G 9.6G 21G 32% /usr/local
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
swap 17G 376K 17G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
swap 17G 64K 17G 1% /tmp
swap 17G 56K 17G 1% /var/run
/sbin 31G 9.6G 21G 32% /var/cluster/sbin.org
/usr/cluster/lib/sc/ifconfig_client_proxy
31G 9.6G 21G 32% /sbin/ifconfig
zdtgdbq01/odb 0K 29K 86G 1% /odb
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/flashdata01
0K 5.1G 4.9G 52%
/odb/dtg02/flashdata01
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/oraarch
0K 525M 9.5G 6% /odb/dtg02/oraarch
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/orabackup
0K 14M 10.0G 1% /odb/dtg02/orabackup
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/orabin
0K 2.2G 7.8G 22% /odb/dtg02/orabin
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/oradata01
0K 1.2G 8.8G 12% /odb/dtg02/oradata01
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/oradata02
0K 1.3G 8.7G 13% /odb/dtg02/oradata02
zdtgdbq01/odb/oem01/orabin
0K 1.9G 8.1G 19% /odb/oem01/orabin
zdtgdbq01 is a ZFS pool used for Oracle database that has been added
to this "zone cluster". Monitoring software looks at "size" column and
sees "0K" and starts sending alerts.
Is there a solution for this? Or is that how it is going to be and
they need to change the way they monitor it?
Customer thinks they haven't configured the resource group properly.
Sunil
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
______ Joseph Balenzano
/_____/\ ISV Engineering
/____ \\ \ Sun Microsystems Inc.
/_____\ \\ / joseph.balenz...@sun.com
/_____/ \/ / / Phone/Fax 203.653.4186
/_____/ / \//\
\_____\//\ / /
\_____/ / /\ /
\_____/ \\ \
\_____\ \\
\_____\/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org