Hung-Sheng Tsao wrote:
>guess is that the memory sharing benefits of sparse zones
>are relatively small in most cases.
May be I am wrong here, it seems that with sparse zone and "single"
binary for all zone
there must be same memory sharing!!!
I don't know what "single" binary you are talking
about. If all of the sparse zones are running the same
applications then there would sharing. If they are
running different applications or even running common
apps at different times, then there would be little
sharing. The core OS daemons would be shared, but that
isn't going to account for much.
zones-discuss mailing list