> > I was wondering about this too.  Indeed, there seems be a sizeable amount
 > > of duplicated code now.  Why is this the right design?
 > Because the sn1 brand is an internal brand for testing
 > and is not delivered to customers.  Once the solaris10
 > brand is integrated, the sn1 brand will no longer serve
 > its original role and could even be removed from the source
 > tree if we wanted to.

I don't see how that addresses the primary point, which is that Solaris
brands seem to suffer from code duplication.  Are you asserting that the
amount of code duplication between the sn1 and solaris10 brands is unique
to that situation and is not something that will occur again when we cons
up the next solarisX brand?

zones-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to