to me this indicates that cluster is at least partially set up, normally if not in cluster you get
r...@guest6 # /usr/cluster/bin/scstat
scstat:  not a cluster member.
r...@guest6 #

I'd strongly suggest a reinstall here to clean things up, as cluster software is installed and partially configured, i.e. scinstall and clsetup appear to have been run.

So if cluster is not being used then strongly suggest a reinstall to get a clean slate to start from.

On 16/02/2010 22:32, Dombrowski, Neil wrote:
There is a /usr/cluster/bin/scstat command, which on each server shows only 
itself (the two servers don't seem to have any info here on the other server). 
I also see a bunch of /usr/cluster/lib/something  processes running on each 
box. I'm making inquiries as to whether the cluster has ever worked, but so far 
it sounds like it was tabled for higher priority projects, and never gotten 
back to.


-----Original Message-----
From: zones-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org 
[mailto:zones-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Enda O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 4:20 PM
To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] networking

Are you sure cluster is disabled, what does /usr/cluster/bin/status show?


On 16/02/2010 21:59, Dombrowski, Neil wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: sowmini.varad...@sun.com [mailto:sowmini.varad...@sun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 1:16 PM
To: Dombrowski, Neil
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] networking

On (02/16/10 19:03), Dombrowski, Neil wrote:

I'm new to zones, and this appears to be a conundrum for me: I have a
global zone that shows multiple default routes (on different
interfaces). It also shows a third separate interface (clprivnet0) with
an IP that's not in anyone's documentation(actually there are two
physical servers set up the same way). My guess is that these two
servers were to be clustered at one point, but this was aborted before
I came onboard. Regardless, the global zone's routing table looks busy,
is it because it's showing the routes for the zones? If so, is it
possible to have the global zone routing differently than the local

hard to answer, without more data on what the subnets for the various
zones are, and what the desired routing is. The global zone's netstat
may show routes that are only accessible from a non-global zone, so the
fact that the routing table is "busy" does not say anything without
more information about the subnet configuration.


For an example, let's say zone1 has a default route using gateway 
and zone2 has a default router using gateway If I am logged into 
the global zone, and it needs to send a packet to, will it use one 
of the non-global-zone's default route? Looking at /etc/defaultrouter for the 
global zone, it shows the gateway IPs for the two non-global zones, and also .  when I try to traceroute to it never shows a single 
hop (as if it's not going to any gateway).

So, why am I not getting to And if I removed the other default 
routes in the global zone, will I be damaging the routing for the local zones? 
If I add a static route in the global zone will that be propagated to the 
non-local zones(I wouldn't want that)? If there's a good doc out there that 
explains this, I'd appreciate a pointer to it, or whatever advice you have for 


zones-discuss mailing list

zones-discuss mailing list

zones-discuss mailing list
  • [zones-discus... Dombrowski, Neil
    • Re: [zon... sowmini . varadhan
      • Re: ... Dombrowski, Neil
        • ... Christine Tran
          • ... Steffen Weiberle
            • ... Dombrowski, Neil
              • ... James Carlson
                • ... Steffen Weiberle
        • ... Enda O'Connor
          • ... Dombrowski, Neil
            • ... Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer
          • ... Ellard Roush

Reply via email to