On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Steve Lawrence <stephen.lawre...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> Now, if you want to account for cpu utilization by children, >> why not use the pr_ctime member of the psinfo structure? >> As far as I understand it, that collects cpu for child processes >> that exit, so why can't that be used instead of monkeying >> about with extended accounting? >> >> What am I overlooking here? > > I haven't explored an algorithm for tracking that. At some point, the child > is running, in which case I may have added its current usage to the zone's > usage. When the children exit later, I would need to figure out the parent > the usage was added to so I can avoid double counting usage I've already > charged to the zone.
Well, no, you just create the process tree and walk down it from the top. Some might worry about missing data from a child that exits while you're doing the measurement; I tend not to worry too much, because you'll catch it on the next interval in any event. > The other bit to solve would be zone-entered processes, which will have a > parent in the global zone. The usage by the"in-the-zone" children would > bubble up to a parent in the global zone. This would certainly be wrong. Well, how common are zone-entered processes? And how should they be accounted for anyway? (What sort of examples do we have?) Thanks! -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org