Synchornized block in NIOServerCnxn ----------------------------------- Key: ZOOKEEPER-59 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-59 Project: Zookeeper Issue Type: Bug Components: server Reporter: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
There are two synchronized blocks locking on different objects, and to me they should be guarded by the same object. Here are the parts of the code I'm talking about: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... synchronized (this) { outstandingRequests++; // check throttling if (zk.getInProcess() > factory.outstandingLimit) { disableRecv(); // following lines should not be needed since we are already // reading // } else { // enableRecv(); } } [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... synchronized (this.factory) { outstandingRequests--; // check throttling if (zk.getInProcess() < factory.outstandingLimit || outstandingRequests < 1) { sk.selector().wakeup(); enableRecv(); } } I think the second one is correct, and the first synchronized block should be guarded by "this.factory". This could be related to issue ZOOKEEPER-57, but I have no concrete indication that this is the case so far. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.