[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617089#action_12617089
]
Hiram Chirino commented on ZOOKEEPER-103:
-----------------------------------------
Hi Patrick yes. Lots projects just keep it flat like that. Some project will
group stuff in a directory if there is a specific grouping to the modules.
Generally it's more specific than a general 'contrib' grouping though.
Also something to think about is the possibility of having independent release
cycles for some of the modules. At this stage of the I don't think we need to
worry about that complexity.
Benjamin,
Generally the final binary distribution does make that distinction. Some
organize as:
/bin : start scripts
/lib : the main zoo keeper jar
/lib/extras or /lib/contrib: optional libs that are not required to run ZK
/doc :
/src
etc. etc.
> Reorganize the ZooKeeper source distro to follow maven conventions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-103
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-103
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Reporter: Hiram Chirino
> Assignee: Hiram Chirino
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-103.patch, ZOOKEEPER-103.sh
>
>
> This was sugested as way to bridge the gap in ZOOKEEPER-83
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
