[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617089#action_12617089
 ] 

Hiram Chirino commented on ZOOKEEPER-103:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Patrick yes.  Lots projects just keep it flat like that.  Some project will 
group stuff in a directory if there is a specific grouping to the modules.  
Generally it's more specific than a general 'contrib' grouping though.

Also something to think about is the possibility of having independent release 
cycles for some of the modules.  At this stage of the I don't think we need to 
worry about that complexity.

Benjamin,

Generally the final binary distribution does make that distinction.  Some 
organize as:
/bin : start scripts
/lib : the main zoo keeper jar 
/lib/extras or /lib/contrib: optional libs that are not required to run ZK
/doc : 
/src

etc. etc.

> Reorganize the ZooKeeper source distro to follow maven conventions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-103
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-103
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: Hiram Chirino
>            Assignee: Hiram Chirino
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-103.patch, ZOOKEEPER-103.sh
>
>
> This was sugested as way to bridge the gap in ZOOKEEPER-83

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to