[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12709121#action_12709121
]
Henry Robinson commented on ZOOKEEPER-395:
------------------------------------------
You're right - I think Python searches for modules by filename (certainly when
I just tried renaming it, it would no longer import, although there may be more
going on behind the scenes), so we would have to write import zookeeper_py
which is a bit clunky to me. zookeeper.so goes in the local
Python/2.5/site-packages directory on my machine which might make the
differentiation clear. Even if we wrap it, it seems like we'd want *some*
module to be called zookeeper eventually :)
> Python bindings
> ---------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-395
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-395
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Henry Robinson
> Assignee: Henry Robinson
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-395.patch, ZOOKEEPER-395.patch
>
>
> ZooKeeper doesn't have Python bindings. Having them would be useful, and
> would complement the extant Perl bindings.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
