Henry Robinson commented on ZOOKEEPER-395:

You're right - I think Python searches for modules by filename (certainly when 
I just tried renaming it, it would no longer import, although there may be more 
going on behind the scenes), so we would have to write import zookeeper_py 
which is a bit clunky to me. zookeeper.so goes in the local 
Python/2.5/site-packages directory on my machine which might make the 
differentiation clear. Even if we wrap it, it seems like we'd want *some* 
module to be called zookeeper eventually :)

> Python bindings
> ---------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-395
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-395
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: Henry Robinson
>            Assignee: Henry Robinson
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-395.patch, ZOOKEEPER-395.patch
> ZooKeeper doesn't have Python bindings. Having them would be useful, and 
> would complement the extant Perl bindings. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to