[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12710036#action_12710036
 ] 

Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-383:
-----------------------------------------

yes i agree it would be good to use separate jiras.

the patch looks good. great job. i'm wondering why you are queuing the 
operations into a blocking queue to send to a separate thread to issue the 
async calls. since they are async calls we could just issue them directly. 
couldn't we?

> Asynchronous version of createLedger()
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-383
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-383
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: contrib-bookkeeper
>            Reporter: Utkarsh Srivastava
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-383.patch
>
>
> While there are async versions for read and write, there is no async version 
> for creating a ledger. This can cause applications to have to change their 
> whole thread design. 
> It should be easier and more consistent to add an async version of 
> createLedger().

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to