Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-505:

+1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  against trunk revision 802188.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

    +1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.

    +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
Findbugs warnings: 
Console output: 

This message is automatically generated.

> testAsyncCreateClose is badly broken
> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-505
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-505
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: contrib-bookkeeper
>            Reporter: Utkarsh Srivastava
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-505.1.patch
> The test case testAsyncCreateClose is badly broken. I was wondering why all 
> the unit tests are passing inspite of having found so many different problems 
> with LedgerManagementProcessor. 
> There is a big try-catch block sitting in the test case that catches all 
> exception, prints their stack trace, and exits, thereby allowing the test to 
> pass. In general, unit tests shouldnt catch exceptions unless it is something 
> you are expecting that will happen.
> Another problem is that the same ControlObject is used for synchronization 
> throughout. Since we already have the problem of callbacks being called 
> multiple times (ZOOKEEPER-502), notify() on the control object is called too 
> many times, resulting in the unit test not waiting for certain callbacks.
> Thus the test never waits for the asyncOpenLedger() to finish, and hence 
> still succeeds. I believe asyncOpenLedger() has never worked right. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to