[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12745475#action_12745475
 ] 

Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-512:
----------------------------------------

Your explanation sounds reasonable, but I don't see anything in the java 
socket{channel} apis that talk about this. perhaps I missed it. Do you have a 
pointer to something that talks about this? (I did some searches and couldn't 
find). Basically, why should we assume that any ioexception results in the 
socket being closed?


> FLE election fails to elect leader
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-512
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-512
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: quorum, server
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.2.1, 3.3.0
>
>         Attachments: jst.txt, logs.tar.gz
>
>
> I was doing some fault injection testing of 3.2.1 with ZOOKEEPER-508 patch 
> applied and noticed that after some time the ensemble failed to re-elect a 
> leader.
> See the attached log files - 5 member ensemble. typically 5 is the leader
> Notice that after 16:23:50,525 no quorum is formed, even after 20 minutes 
> elapses w/no quorum
> environment:
> I was doing fault injection testing using aspectj. The faults are injected 
> into socketchannel read/write, I throw exceptions randomly at a 1/200 ratio 
> (rand.nextFloat() <= .005 => throw IOException
> You can see when a fault is injected in the log via:
> 2009-08-19 16:57:09,568 - INFO  [Thread-74:readrequestfailsintermitten...@38] 
> - READPACKET FORCED FAIL
> vs a read/write that didn't force fail:
> 2009-08-19 16:57:09,568 - INFO  [Thread-74:readrequestfailsintermitten...@41] 
> - READPACKET OK
> otw standard code/config (straight fle quorum with 5 members)
> also see the attached jstack trace. this is for one of the servers. Notice in 
> particular that the number of sendworkers != the number of recv workers.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to