---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Adam Rosien <a...@rosien.net>
Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: blog post about zk and group membership
Yes, your Disqus comment went through. We filed a ticket with them
Data wrappers would certainly work but I feel like it's still a
black-hole to fall into that something like node-metadata (to do
something like HTTP's Content-Type") would help solve. That too can be
a black hole :(. I need more practical experience to find the right
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> Adam Rosien wrote:
>> Re "off the shelf", my title of "Actually Implementing" was a *bit*
>> snarky to try and gain some readers, but it wasn't intended to be
>> sharp criticism; more documented recipes is a good thing for everyone.
>> I'd be happy to submit a JIRA with a group membership recipe.
> Ya, I got that, no worries. It was a valid point and something I've been
> asked before. Figured I could get some (addl) free work out of the deal. ;-)
> Disqus seems to be having troubles, I've tried like 3 times to comment on
> your blog post, did it finally make it through?
>> Re zkclient, I agree that documentation is a big thing, which I hope
>> to help out with as I use it more. I'm talking now with one of the
>> developers about zkclient's implementation of data serialization since
>> that is another big area; zk pushes all serialization semantics into
>> the clients, which is ok but requires its own practical strategies.
> Yea, that's an interesting point. I suspect that a wrapper around the data
> (zk contrib? subclass/proxy of ZooKeeper?) that put content-type type
> information into the "header" of the data portion might be useful. The
> wrapper could encode/decode based on the data type in ZK, vs the data type
> the user would like. The wrapper could support whichever encode/decode the
> user would like (say xml/json to start) etc... Donno how useful in general
> but in a larger system with a bunch of heterogeneous clients accessing it
> might be interesting.
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Adam, this is awesome! I've retweeted it on my twitter account:
>>> A few comments:
>>> 1) you are correct about the "off the shelf" part, but really alot of
>>> is our marketing blurb, we paint with a broad stroke. I think it would
>>> sense to include this sort of detail in the "recipes" page though, would
>>> be interested to create a JIRA and submit some content? (you could re
>>> purpose alot of what you have in your post)
>>> 2) re zkclient - I have not been following that project closely of late,
>>> however Mahadev and I did review their code a few months ago. At that
>>> we had some concerns about the semantic impact of some of the design
>>> they made (which were fine, just not well documented and therefor easy
>>> users to miss). In particular (again, at the time, may be addressed by
>>> watch notifications could be lost during disconnected/expired sessions,
>>> the user would not be made aware of this.
>>> 3) excellent point/suggestion on the "rogue" service
>>> Adam Rosien wrote:
>>>> I've written a blog post about using ZooKeeper for group membership at
>>>> Any comments or feedback is welcome.
>>>> .. Adam