[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benjamin Reed updated ZOOKEEPER-635:
------------------------------------
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
do we really need both clientPortBindAddress and clientPortBindHostname?
especially since they do the same thing...
we need a test case for this. we should configure the server to bind to an
interface address and attempt to connect to it using localhost.
> Server supports listening on a specified network address
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-635
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-635
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 3.2.1
> Reporter: Steve Chu
> Assignee: Patrick Hunt
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-635.patch, ZOOKEEPER-635.patch
>
>
> The issue in maililist is located:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-zookeeper-user/200912.mbox/%[email protected]%3e
> I have checked the server size code, seems no this option provided. This
> feature is useful when we have more than two network interfaces, one for
> Internet and others for intranet. We want to run ZooKeeper in our intranet
> and not be exposed to outside world.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
