[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12907331#action_12907331
]
Tim Robertson commented on ZOOKEEPER-645:
-----------------------------------------
I have applied the patch but still see that locks generated by subsequent
clients are not respected by the first client and it is always able to get the
lock
> Bug in WriteLock recipe implementation?
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-645
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-645
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: recipes
> Affects Versions: 3.2.2
> Environment: 3.2.2 java 1.6.0_12
> Reporter: Jaakko Laine
> Assignee: Mahadev konar
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
> Attachments: 645-fix-findPrefixInChildren.patch
>
>
> Not sure, but there seem to be two issues in the example WriteLock:
> (1) ZNodeName is sorted according to session ID first, and then according to
> znode sequence number. This might cause starvation as lower session IDs
> always get priority. WriteLock is not thread-safe in the first place, so
> having session ID involved in compare operation does not seem to make sense.
> (2) if findPrefixInChildren finds previous ID, it should add dir in front of
> the ID
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
